<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 67 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333047</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the appellant company and directors, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The decision was based on the lack of concrete evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal, as well as the questionable basis for calculating duty. The appellant was relieved of the duty demands and penalties, emphasizing the importance of substantiated claims in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 67 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333047</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the appellant company and directors, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The decision was based on the lack of concrete evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal, as well as the questionable basis for calculating duty. The appellant was relieved of the duty demands and penalties, emphasizing the importance of substantiated claims in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>