<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 63 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333043</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority to ascertain the relevant date of export by verifying the receipt of foreign exchange in India for assessing the limitation aspect, disposing of the stay application. The Tribunal held that the refund claim for Cenvat credit should be filed after the last day of the respective quarter, determining the relevant date for export services as the date of export in accordance with applicable notifications and legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 00:11:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 63 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333043</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority to ascertain the relevant date of export by verifying the receipt of foreign exchange in India for assessing the limitation aspect, disposing of the stay application. The Tribunal held that the refund claim for Cenvat credit should be filed after the last day of the respective quarter, determining the relevant date for export services as the date of export in accordance with applicable notifications and legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>