<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 57 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333037</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the sale consideration as &#039;Capital Gains&#039; rather than &#039;Business Income&#039; in a slump sale transaction. It dismissed the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding the treatment of personnel as assets and the existence of a non-competition element in the transaction. The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to reconsider the comparables used for analysis, excluding certain companies and including others. Overall, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection and appeals, emphasizing the correct tax treatment and application of Transfer Pricing provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2016 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 57 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333037</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of the sale consideration as &#039;Capital Gains&#039; rather than &#039;Business Income&#039; in a slump sale transaction. It dismissed the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding the treatment of personnel as assets and the existence of a non-competition element in the transaction. The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to reconsider the comparables used for analysis, excluding certain companies and including others. Overall, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection and appeals, emphasizing the correct tax treatment and application of Transfer Pricing provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>