<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 52 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333032</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the addition of undisclosed income, citing unexplained delay and lack of acceptable grounds for challenging the assessment order. The Court found the petitioner&#039;s reasons for delay insufficient and noted the absence of valid grounds for interference. The petition was rejected without delving into its maintainability, as the delay and lack of grounds were deemed significant for dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2016 20:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 52 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333032</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the addition of undisclosed income, citing unexplained delay and lack of acceptable grounds for challenging the assessment order. The Court found the petitioner&#039;s reasons for delay insufficient and noted the absence of valid grounds for interference. The petition was rejected without delving into its maintainability, as the delay and lack of grounds were deemed significant for dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>