<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 46 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333026</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant registration to the society, emphasizing the public utility nature of the institute&#039;s objectives and its financial sustainability model. The Court clarified the application of Section 2(15) proviso, stating that at the registration stage, the proviso&#039;s assessment was premature, and its applicability would be considered during exemption granting. Consequently, the tax appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2016 00:08:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 46 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333026</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant registration to the society, emphasizing the public utility nature of the institute&#039;s objectives and its financial sustainability model. The Court clarified the application of Section 2(15) proviso, stating that at the registration stage, the proviso&#039;s assessment was premature, and its applicability would be considered during exemption granting. Consequently, the tax appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>