<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 45 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333025</link>
    <description>The Tax Appeal was dismissed as the court found that the assessee had followed the recognized accounting principle of booking profit based on the project completion method for ongoing construction projects. Despite discrepancies in the Commissioner&#039;s calculations, there was no evidence of deviation from this method in the past or objections raised by the department, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2016 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 45 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333025</link>
      <description>The Tax Appeal was dismissed as the court found that the assessee had followed the recognized accounting principle of booking profit based on the project completion method for ongoing construction projects. Despite discrepancies in the Commissioner&#039;s calculations, there was no evidence of deviation from this method in the past or objections raised by the department, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>