<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (1) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5264</link>
    <description>The proviso to section 4(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 was read according to its plain language: the phrase &quot;for any assessment year commencing after the 31st day of March, 1964&quot; qualified the gift-tax condition, not the commencement of the wealth-tax exemption. The statutory scheme was described as preventing avoidance of wealth-tax through transfers to a spouse or minor child, while the proviso carved out only a limited exception for transfers chargeable to gift-tax or exempt under section 5 of the Gift-tax Act, 1958. A construction adopted only to avoid possible constitutional difficulty was rejected where it would contradict the text.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (1) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5264</link>
      <description>The proviso to section 4(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 was read according to its plain language: the phrase &quot;for any assessment year commencing after the 31st day of March, 1964&quot; qualified the gift-tax condition, not the commencement of the wealth-tax exemption. The statutory scheme was described as preventing avoidance of wealth-tax through transfers to a spouse or minor child, while the proviso carved out only a limited exception for transfers chargeable to gift-tax or exempt under section 5 of the Gift-tax Act, 1958. A construction adopted only to avoid possible constitutional difficulty was rejected where it would contradict the text.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>