<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 34 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333014</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of Gem Granites, a 100% EOU, allowing them to claim CENVAT credit on High Speed Diesel (HSD) despite Rule 2(k) exclusion. Gem Granites&#039; entitlement was supported by Notification No. 22/2003 exempting HSD procurement for EOUs from duty and Circular No. 799/32/2004-CX allowing refund under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with the notification over the restrictive definition of input in Rule 2(k), rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments. Previous Tribunal decisions and case laws favored Gem Granites, leading to the dismissal of demands and penalties imposed by the Revenue in a judgment pronounced on 29/09/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 34 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333014</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of Gem Granites, a 100% EOU, allowing them to claim CENVAT credit on High Speed Diesel (HSD) despite Rule 2(k) exclusion. Gem Granites&#039; entitlement was supported by Notification No. 22/2003 exempting HSD procurement for EOUs from duty and Circular No. 799/32/2004-CX allowing refund under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with the notification over the restrictive definition of input in Rule 2(k), rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments. Previous Tribunal decisions and case laws favored Gem Granites, leading to the dismissal of demands and penalties imposed by the Revenue in a judgment pronounced on 29/09/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>