<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 31 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333011</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the denial of Cenvat Credit on input services due to invoicing issues and the penalties imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal emphasized that the invoicing irregularity did not automatically disentitle the appellant from availing the credit, citing a decision of the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court. Consequently, the penalties imposed on the appellant and its employee were nullified, providing a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 18:32:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 31 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333011</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the denial of Cenvat Credit on input services due to invoicing issues and the penalties imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal emphasized that the invoicing irregularity did not automatically disentitle the appellant from availing the credit, citing a decision of the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court. Consequently, the penalties imposed on the appellant and its employee were nullified, providing a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>