<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 29 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333009</link>
    <description>An adjudication order in a Central Excise demand, confiscation and penalty matter must rest on proper appreciation of the record, the defence and the controversy raised in the show cause notice. Where the authority passes a superficial order without examining whether the units are distinct and without testing the evidentiary value of materials gathered during investigation, the order lacks the reasoned consideration required in fiscal proceedings. The matter was therefore remanded for de novo adjudication, with a fair opportunity of hearing and a fresh reasoned order, and no merits determination of duty liability was reached.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 29 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333009</link>
      <description>An adjudication order in a Central Excise demand, confiscation and penalty matter must rest on proper appreciation of the record, the defence and the controversy raised in the show cause notice. Where the authority passes a superficial order without examining whether the units are distinct and without testing the evidentiary value of materials gathered during investigation, the order lacks the reasoned consideration required in fiscal proceedings. The matter was therefore remanded for de novo adjudication, with a fair opportunity of hearing and a fresh reasoned order, and no merits determination of duty liability was reached.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>