<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 18 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332998</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Customs &amp;amp; Central Excise Settlement Commission in allowing the settlement applications of the Respondent for customs duty, penalty, and fine in two separate cases. The Court found that the Commission&#039;s actions were justified, considering the facts, legal arguments, and compliance with Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. The Court affirmed the settlement orders, dismissing challenges raised by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and the Commissioner of Customs. The Court&#039;s judgment emphasized adherence to customs regulations and previous legal interpretations, ultimately supporting the Commission&#039;s rulings on the settlements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 18 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332998</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Customs &amp;amp; Central Excise Settlement Commission in allowing the settlement applications of the Respondent for customs duty, penalty, and fine in two separate cases. The Court found that the Commission&#039;s actions were justified, considering the facts, legal arguments, and compliance with Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. The Court affirmed the settlement orders, dismissing challenges raised by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and the Commissioner of Customs. The Court&#039;s judgment emphasized adherence to customs regulations and previous legal interpretations, ultimately supporting the Commission&#039;s rulings on the settlements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>