https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186839 Short delay in filing the revision petition was condoned on sufficient cause being shown. On the merits, the court held that a Magistrate cannot refuse to proceed under Sections 82 to 85 of the Code of Criminal Procedure merely because the earlier proclamation was allegedly imperfectly executed by the investigating agency. Where the accused is not traceable, the statutory proclamation process must be carried through in accordance with law, and agency lapses do not justify inaction. The order refusing to proceed was set aside and coercive steps were directed against the accused. en-us Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Oct 2016 17:04:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186839 Short delay in filing the revision petition was condoned on sufficient cause being shown. On the merits, the court held that a Magistrate cannot refuse to proceed under Sections 82 to 85 of the Code of Criminal Procedure merely because the earlier proclamation was allegedly imperfectly executed by the investigating agency. Where the accused is not traceable, the statutory proclamation process must be carried through in accordance with law, and agency lapses do not justify inaction. The order refusing to proceed was set aside and coercive steps were directed against the accused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186839