<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1218 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186830</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tax Board&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 22A(7) for suspected tax evasion. The Court found no grounds for interference, emphasizing the Tax Board&#039;s reasoned decision based on evidence. It noted the lack of compliance with principles of natural justice in the penalty imposition process, leading to the penalty&#039;s deletion. Despite the revenue&#039;s request for a remand, the Court dismissed the revision petition due to the significant time elapsed since the penalty imposition in 1991. The judgment stressed the importance of fair treatment and thorough consideration of evidence in administrative proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1218 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186830</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tax Board&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 22A(7) for suspected tax evasion. The Court found no grounds for interference, emphasizing the Tax Board&#039;s reasoned decision based on evidence. It noted the lack of compliance with principles of natural justice in the penalty imposition process, leading to the penalty&#039;s deletion. Despite the revenue&#039;s request for a remand, the Court dismissed the revision petition due to the significant time elapsed since the penalty imposition in 1991. The judgment stressed the importance of fair treatment and thorough consideration of evidence in administrative proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>