<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 894 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer was not justified in taxing the income from advertising time sales in India in the hands of the appellant, as the revenues were appropriately taxed in the hands of the commission agent. The Tribunal remitted other issues raised in the appeal for fresh adjudication by the CIT(A). The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review of the tax implications and other consequences raised by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 894 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer was not justified in taxing the income from advertising time sales in India in the hands of the appellant, as the revenues were appropriately taxed in the hands of the commission agent. The Tribunal remitted other issues raised in the appeal for fresh adjudication by the CIT(A). The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review of the tax implications and other consequences raised by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>