<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 320 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186818</link>
    <description>Consistency between eyewitness and medical evidence is assessed on material compatibility, not minor variations in the weapon&#039;s use where the medical findings support the described assault. Alleged ante-timing of a first information report requires examination of whether the circumstance is explainable and genuinely undermines the prosecution version. Independent eyewitness testimony should not be rejected on conjecture when it has no intrinsic infirmity and is corroborated by surrounding circumstances. Appellate review of an acquittal may be relevant where the evidentiary record has been misread or assessed perversely. The discussion concerns proof beyond reasonable doubt and common-intention liability for homicide.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 16:08:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 320 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186818</link>
      <description>Consistency between eyewitness and medical evidence is assessed on material compatibility, not minor variations in the weapon&#039;s use where the medical findings support the described assault. Alleged ante-timing of a first information report requires examination of whether the circumstance is explainable and genuinely undermines the prosecution version. Independent eyewitness testimony should not be rejected on conjecture when it has no intrinsic infirmity and is corroborated by surrounding circumstances. Appellate review of an acquittal may be relevant where the evidentiary record has been misread or assessed perversely. The discussion concerns proof beyond reasonable doubt and common-intention liability for homicide.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>