https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186817 The packaged commodities rules required a definite, plain and conspicuous declaration of the sale price on every package, and this obligation was not confined to the manufacturer. Rule 6(1) applied to the package itself, while Rule 6(2) on display of local taxes by a retail dealer was additional to, not exhaustive of, the broader disclosure duty. A restrictive reading that would leave retail pricing undisclosed to consumers was rejected as inconsistent with the consumer-protection purpose of the framework. The consumer fora's directions requiring price disclosure were upheld. en-us Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Oct 2016 15:57:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186817 The packaged commodities rules required a definite, plain and conspicuous declaration of the sale price on every package, and this obligation was not confined to the manufacturer. Rule 6(1) applied to the package itself, while Rule 6(2) on display of local taxes by a retail dealer was additional to, not exhaustive of, the broader disclosure duty. A restrictive reading that would leave retail pricing undisclosed to consumers was rejected as inconsistent with the consumer-protection purpose of the framework. The consumer fora's directions requiring price disclosure were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186817