<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 4 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 33,80,000/- related to alleged sales to DLF Services Limited and allowing the claim of bad debts of Rs. 6,22,705/- due to non-payment of service tax by ONGC and RBI. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had not verified the claims adequately and that the explanations provided by the assessee were substantiated by the evidence presented. The order was pronounced on 16.08.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 4 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 33,80,000/- related to alleged sales to DLF Services Limited and allowing the claim of bad debts of Rs. 6,22,705/- due to non-payment of service tax by ONGC and RBI. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had not verified the claims adequately and that the explanations provided by the assessee were substantiated by the evidence presented. The order was pronounced on 16.08.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>