<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1242 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186808</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals but partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2003-04 and 2006-07 regarding deduction u/s. 80IB. The CIT (A) decision was upheld, allowing the deduction as the assessee was found to employ more than 10 workers. The ITAT also clarified that the deduction u/s. 80IB is limited to available gross total income. Additionally, interest u/s. 234D was not charged for A.Y. 2003-04 based on a Delhi High Court decision. The order was pronounced on 12-08-2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 10:36:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1242 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186808</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals but partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for Assessment Year 2003-04 and 2006-07 regarding deduction u/s. 80IB. The CIT (A) decision was upheld, allowing the deduction as the assessee was found to employ more than 10 workers. The ITAT also clarified that the deduction u/s. 80IB is limited to available gross total income. Additionally, interest u/s. 234D was not charged for A.Y. 2003-04 based on a Delhi High Court decision. The order was pronounced on 12-08-2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>