<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (11) TMI 68 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186802</link>
    <description>For carry-forward and set-off of business loss under section 24(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, the relevant test is whether the loss arose from the same business that continued in the later year. Common ownership, common funds, a central cash book, or centralized accounts are not enough by themselves; the activities must be inter-related, inter-dependent, and so connected in their trading structure that they form one business. On that basis, diverse activities such as brickworks, a ration shop, lorry hire, a petrol bunk, partnership interests, and film distribution were treated as independent ventures. The earlier film distribution loss was therefore not available for set-off against the later year&#039;s profits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 18:39:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (11) TMI 68 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186802</link>
      <description>For carry-forward and set-off of business loss under section 24(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, the relevant test is whether the loss arose from the same business that continued in the later year. Common ownership, common funds, a central cash book, or centralized accounts are not enough by themselves; the activities must be inter-related, inter-dependent, and so connected in their trading structure that they form one business. On that basis, diverse activities such as brickworks, a ration shop, lorry hire, a petrol bunk, partnership interests, and film distribution were treated as independent ventures. The earlier film distribution loss was therefore not available for set-off against the later year&#039;s profits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>