<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 623 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186785</link>
    <description>Arrested persons must be produced before the nearest magistrate within twenty-four hours, subject only to the recognised constitutional and journey-time exceptions, and further police detention beyond that limit requires lawful magistrate authorisation under the Code and Article 22. Where the State admitted that the accused was not so produced within the prescribed time, detention after that point was unlawful and could not be justified by the absence of production in another case. The earlier bail order would operate once the required bond was furnished, unless detention was otherwise lawfully required in a separate matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:42:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 623 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186785</link>
      <description>Arrested persons must be produced before the nearest magistrate within twenty-four hours, subject only to the recognised constitutional and journey-time exceptions, and further police detention beyond that limit requires lawful magistrate authorisation under the Code and Article 22. Where the State admitted that the accused was not so produced within the prescribed time, detention after that point was unlawful and could not be justified by the absence of production in another case. The earlier bail order would operate once the required bond was furnished, unless detention was otherwise lawfully required in a separate matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>