<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Rules Re-assessment Not Allowed Under &quot;Rectification&quot; Using Section 69 KVAT Act Based on Later Clarification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31439</link>
    <description>Whether the re-assessment was permissible under the head of “Rectification of the order in purported exercise of the power u/s 69 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 on the basis of a clarification issued by the Commissioner which itself is after the order of re-assessment dated 28.6.2010? - Held no - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:26:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:26:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Rules Re-assessment Not Allowed Under &quot;Rectification&quot; Using Section 69 KVAT Act Based on Later Clarification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31439</link>
      <description>Whether the re-assessment was permissible under the head of “Rectification of the order in purported exercise of the power u/s 69 of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 on the basis of a clarification issued by the Commissioner which itself is after the order of re-assessment dated 28.6.2010? - Held no - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:26:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>