<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1236 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332975</link>
    <description>Cash discount known at or before clearance and supported by contemporaneous credit notes was deductible from assessable value, because it formed part of the sale arrangement and was shown to have been passed on to buyers. CENVAT credit on goods received from the assessee&#039;s own unit could not be denied where duty had actually been paid, the goods were received, and they were used in the recipient unit; the supplier&#039;s alleged lack of duty liability was not, by itself, a ground to refuse credit. The assessee succeeded on both valuation and credit issues, and the impugned orders were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:27:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1236 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332975</link>
      <description>Cash discount known at or before clearance and supported by contemporaneous credit notes was deductible from assessable value, because it formed part of the sale arrangement and was shown to have been passed on to buyers. CENVAT credit on goods received from the assessee&#039;s own unit could not be denied where duty had actually been paid, the goods were received, and they were used in the recipient unit; the supplier&#039;s alleged lack of duty liability was not, by itself, a ground to refuse credit. The assessee succeeded on both valuation and credit issues, and the impugned orders were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>