<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) wrongly rejected appeal; proper authorization was supported by board resolution, not MD signature.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31502</link>
    <description>Compliance of the statutory requirement of signing and verification of the memorandum of appeal by an authorised person and not by the Managing Director - Authorization is supported by valid resolution of board of directors, CIT(A) is not correct in rejected the appeal - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:25:06 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:25:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) wrongly rejected appeal; proper authorization was supported by board resolution, not MD signature.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31502</link>
      <description>Compliance of the statutory requirement of signing and verification of the memorandum of appeal by an authorised person and not by the Managing Director - Authorization is supported by valid resolution of board of directors, CIT(A) is not correct in rejected the appeal - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:25:06 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>