<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1217 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332956</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the addition of income from the sale of Transferable Development Right (TDR), finding it non-taxable as the TDR was not in existence at the time of land purchase. However, the court sided with the revenue in disallowing 5% of expenses due to lack of third-party evidence. Penalty proceedings were not pursued as no penalty was levied. The appeal was partly allowed, with the decision announced on 19th August 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 07:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1217 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332956</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the addition of income from the sale of Transferable Development Right (TDR), finding it non-taxable as the TDR was not in existence at the time of land purchase. However, the court sided with the revenue in disallowing 5% of expenses due to lack of third-party evidence. Penalty proceedings were not pursued as no penalty was levied. The appeal was partly allowed, with the decision announced on 19th August 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>