<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1201 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332940</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2008-09. Relief was granted on the disallowance of exemption under section 54F of the Act, as the assessee invested in a residential property within the extended period for filing the return. The disallowance under section 14A was directed for re-verification due to a computation mistake. The plea to drop penalty proceedings was dismissed as premature since no penalty had been levied in the current order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:24:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1201 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332940</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2008-09. Relief was granted on the disallowance of exemption under section 54F of the Act, as the assessee invested in a residential property within the extended period for filing the return. The disallowance under section 14A was directed for re-verification due to a computation mistake. The plea to drop penalty proceedings was dismissed as premature since no penalty had been levied in the current order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>