<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 676 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186782</link>
    <description>An inordinate delay of 601 days in filing the civil appeal was not condoned because the explanation offered was vague and limited to the file moving from table to table. The Court found this unsatisfactory and rejected the condonation application. As a result, the appeal stood dismissed on the ground of delay alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 11:05:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 676 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186782</link>
      <description>An inordinate delay of 601 days in filing the civil appeal was not condoned because the explanation offered was vague and limited to the file moving from table to table. The Court found this unsatisfactory and rejected the condonation application. As a result, the appeal stood dismissed on the ground of delay alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>