<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1668 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186781</link>
    <description>The ITAT Pune allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty under section 271B imposed on the land acquisitions and developers company for failing to get its accounts audited within the specified time. The penalty of Rs. 36,249 was overturned based on the assessee&#039;s genuine reasons for the delay in audit, citing that mere delay in filing the audit report does not automatically warrant a penalty. The ITAT Pune directed the Assessing Officer to cancel the penalty, emphasizing the bonafide explanations provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1668 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186781</link>
      <description>The ITAT Pune allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty under section 271B imposed on the land acquisitions and developers company for failing to get its accounts audited within the specified time. The penalty of Rs. 36,249 was overturned based on the assessee&#039;s genuine reasons for the delay in audit, citing that mere delay in filing the audit report does not automatically warrant a penalty. The ITAT Pune directed the Assessing Officer to cancel the penalty, emphasizing the bonafide explanations provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>