<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1142 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186774</link>
    <description>Retrospective cancellation of a seller&#039;s registration does not, by itself, justify reversal or denial of input tax credit already availed by a purchasing dealer who acted on the strength of a valid registration certificate then in force. The court applied the principle that a buyer is entitled to rely on the seller&#039;s existing registration when the transaction was made, and a later retrospective cancellation cannot prejudice that position. Following the earlier binding view, the denial of input tax credit on this ground was held unsustainable, and the assessment orders were set aside to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1142 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186774</link>
      <description>Retrospective cancellation of a seller&#039;s registration does not, by itself, justify reversal or denial of input tax credit already availed by a purchasing dealer who acted on the strength of a valid registration certificate then in force. The court applied the principle that a buyer is entitled to rely on the seller&#039;s existing registration when the transaction was made, and a later retrospective cancellation cannot prejudice that position. Following the earlier binding view, the denial of input tax credit on this ground was held unsustainable, and the assessment orders were set aside to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>