<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1267 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186767</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai upheld the principle of disallowance of inflated labour charges in an appeal challenging an order related to assessments under the Income Tax Act. The appellant&#039;s contention for a different computation based on stock registers was rejected due to lack of evidence provided. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to recompute the disallowance using actual bills of labour charges. Cooperation from the appellant in providing necessary details for the revised computation was emphasized. The matter was remitted for further proceedings in line with the Tribunal&#039;s directions. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:20:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1267 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186767</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai upheld the principle of disallowance of inflated labour charges in an appeal challenging an order related to assessments under the Income Tax Act. The appellant&#039;s contention for a different computation based on stock registers was rejected due to lack of evidence provided. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to recompute the disallowance using actual bills of labour charges. Cooperation from the appellant in providing necessary details for the revised computation was emphasized. The matter was remitted for further proceedings in line with the Tribunal&#039;s directions. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>