<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1054 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186750</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the Tribunal held that no disallowance of interest can be made if interest-free loans are used for business purposes, following the precedent set in S.A. Builders vs. CIT. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the deduction for foreign exchange loss on a loan given to the Singapore company, citing the judgment in CIT v. Woodward Governor India (P) Ltd. Consequently, the additions of both disallowance of interest on loans and foreign exchange loss were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 11:08:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1054 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186750</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the Tribunal held that no disallowance of interest can be made if interest-free loans are used for business purposes, following the precedent set in S.A. Builders vs. CIT. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the deduction for foreign exchange loss on a loan given to the Singapore company, citing the judgment in CIT v. Woodward Governor India (P) Ltd. Consequently, the additions of both disallowance of interest on loans and foreign exchange loss were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>