<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules on Zinc Ingots Manufacturing Case: Revenue Cannot Selectively Use Statements to Their Advantage.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31496</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal of goods - Whether appellant was manufacturing Zinc Ingots for the entire period from 1996-1997 to 2000-2001 or started such Zinc Ingot manufacturing few days before the search - It is a well accepted legal proposition now that a statement has to be accepted as a whole and Revenue cannot pick and choose the portions of a statement favourable to them. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:55:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:55:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules on Zinc Ingots Manufacturing Case: Revenue Cannot Selectively Use Statements to Their Advantage.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31496</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal of goods - Whether appellant was manufacturing Zinc Ingots for the entire period from 1996-1997 to 2000-2001 or started such Zinc Ingot manufacturing few days before the search - It is a well accepted legal proposition now that a statement has to be accepted as a whole and Revenue cannot pick and choose the portions of a statement favourable to them. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:55:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>