<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332923</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine the evidence and explanations provided by the assessee regarding the source of cash deposits and to reassess the matter afresh. The proper and adequate opportunity of being heard was to be provided to the assessee in accordance with the principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:55:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332923</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine the evidence and explanations provided by the assessee regarding the source of cash deposits and to reassess the matter afresh. The proper and adequate opportunity of being heard was to be provided to the assessee in accordance with the principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>