https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332916 The Tribunal allowed the appeal to the extent that the case of clandestine removal was not proven against the appellant. The issue of confiscation and duty payment for the seized Zinc Ingots was remanded for further assessment. The judgment emphasized the importance of reliable evidence and proper calculation methods in determining duty demands and confiscations. en-us Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332916 The Tribunal allowed the appeal to the extent that the case of clandestine removal was not proven against the appellant. The issue of confiscation and duty payment for the seized Zinc Ingots was remanded for further assessment. The judgment emphasized the importance of reliable evidence and proper calculation methods in determining duty demands and confiscations. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332916