<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1166 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332905</link>
    <description>Rule 23 permits a mid-term anti-dumping review and corresponding modification of duty where relevant material shows continued protection is needed to counter dumped imports and likely recurrence of injury. The review must follow, so far as applicable, the principles of the original investigation, and the Designated Authority may rely on changed circumstances to enhance or adjust duty. The methodology for normal value, dumping margin and injury was upheld, including use of adjusted cost data, available import data for non-cooperating exporters, and assessment of price and injury effects. No serious procedural or methodological infirmity was found.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1166 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332905</link>
      <description>Rule 23 permits a mid-term anti-dumping review and corresponding modification of duty where relevant material shows continued protection is needed to counter dumped imports and likely recurrence of injury. The review must follow, so far as applicable, the principles of the original investigation, and the Designated Authority may rely on changed circumstances to enhance or adjust duty. The methodology for normal value, dumping margin and injury was upheld, including use of adjusted cost data, available import data for non-cooperating exporters, and assessment of price and injury effects. No serious procedural or methodological infirmity was found.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>