https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332895 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking recovery of money from U.P. Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, emphasizing that contractual disputes with statutory bodies should be resolved through common law principles or arbitration, not Article 226. The court held that seeking a money decree through a writ petition was not permissible under extraordinary equitable jurisdiction, citing precedents. As the prayer for recovery was akin to seeking a money decree through Article 226, the court found no basis for intervention and dismissed the petition, vacating any interim orders. en-us Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Sep 2016 22:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332895 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking recovery of money from U.P. Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, emphasizing that contractual disputes with statutory bodies should be resolved through common law principles or arbitration, not Article 226. The court held that seeking a money decree through a writ petition was not permissible under extraordinary equitable jurisdiction, citing precedents. As the prayer for recovery was akin to seeking a money decree through Article 226, the court found no basis for intervention and dismissed the petition, vacating any interim orders. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332895