<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Balram Pur Chini</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110973</link>
    <description>Question contrasts excise duty treatment of commercially marketable waste: oil cake held dutiable in one line of cases, while bagasse was not in another. The operative legal issue is whether commercial marketability converts a waste or by-product into a dutiable good, with recent administrative circulars and the application of Rule six cited as determinative for bagasse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:43:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Balram Pur Chini</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110973</link>
      <description>Question contrasts excise duty treatment of commercially marketable waste: oil cake held dutiable in one line of cases, while bagasse was not in another. The operative legal issue is whether commercial marketability converts a waste or by-product into a dutiable good, with recent administrative circulars and the application of Rule six cited as determinative for bagasse.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:43:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>