https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186738 The Delhi High Court, in a judgment by Mr. Jayant Nath, dismissed a writ petition filed by a practicing advocate and member of the Sales Tax Bar Association seeking relief through public interest litigation regarding alleged failure to release refunds under the DVAT Act. The court held that the issue of refund claims is individual in nature, and aggrieved parties should seek redressal individually rather than through public interest litigation. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as the court found the issue did not warrant consideration in a public interest litigation context. en-us Wed, 25 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Sep 2016 21:00:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186738 The Delhi High Court, in a judgment by Mr. Jayant Nath, dismissed a writ petition filed by a practicing advocate and member of the Sales Tax Bar Association seeking relief through public interest litigation regarding alleged failure to release refunds under the DVAT Act. The court held that the issue of refund claims is individual in nature, and aggrieved parties should seek redressal individually rather than through public interest litigation. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as the court found the issue did not warrant consideration in a public interest litigation context. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 25 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186738