<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 861 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186715</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court declined to admit the civil appeal on the facts and dismissed it. The order reflects no substantive determination on the underlying central excise dispute; it records only that the appeal was not entertained after consideration of the factual circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:58:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 861 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186715</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court declined to admit the civil appeal on the facts and dismissed it. The order reflects no substantive determination on the underlying central excise dispute; it records only that the appeal was not entertained after consideration of the factual circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>