<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1154 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332893</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of Rs. 76,24,680 under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the cash payments made by the assessee to a government agent for statutory obligations were genuine and made under compulsion, therefore not subject to disallowance. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of the transactions and the compliance with statutory requirements, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee on 12/08/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 22:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1154 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332893</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of Rs. 76,24,680 under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the cash payments made by the assessee to a government agent for statutory obligations were genuine and made under compulsion, therefore not subject to disallowance. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of the transactions and the compliance with statutory requirements, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee on 12/08/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>