<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1152 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332891</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of the short term capital loss claimed by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the transactions were genuine, supported by adequate documentation, despite the suspension of the broker involved. Emphasizing the importance of substantiating claims with proper evidence, the Tribunal concluded that the disallowance was unjustified, highlighting the need to establish the authenticity of transactions through documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 22:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1152 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332891</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of the short term capital loss claimed by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the transactions were genuine, supported by adequate documentation, despite the suspension of the broker involved. Emphasizing the importance of substantiating claims with proper evidence, the Tribunal concluded that the disallowance was unjustified, highlighting the need to establish the authenticity of transactions through documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>