https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5223 Condonation of delay in filing a special leave petition was refused because the applicants failed to show sufficient grounds for the delay. The Court found that a mere chronology of dates, from receipt of the certified copy to filing of the petition, did not explain the delays at three stages. A request for further time to file a supplemental affidavit was also declined, as the applicants had ample opportunity over nearly one year and nine months but did not furnish the missing explanation. The special leave petition was therefore dismissed as not maintainable on the material presented. en-us Mon, 24 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5223 Condonation of delay in filing a special leave petition was refused because the applicants failed to show sufficient grounds for the delay. The Court found that a mere chronology of dates, from receipt of the certified copy to filing of the petition, did not explain the delays at three stages. A request for further time to file a supplemental affidavit was also declined, as the applicants had ample opportunity over nearly one year and nine months but did not furnish the missing explanation. The special leave petition was therefore dismissed as not maintainable on the material presented. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 24 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5223