<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1147 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332886</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, ruling that the disallowance under section 40A(3) and the assessment order under section 153A were unjustified due to the absence of incriminating material and pending assessment during the search. Consequently, the charging of interest under section 234B was deemed inconsequential, leading to the overall success of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:51:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1147 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332886</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, ruling that the disallowance under section 40A(3) and the assessment order under section 153A were unjustified due to the absence of incriminating material and pending assessment during the search. Consequently, the charging of interest under section 234B was deemed inconsequential, leading to the overall success of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>