https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332862 A mid-term review under the Anti-Dumping Rules cannot be used to retrospectively withdraw anti-dumping duty and unsettle an earlier final finding that was never challenged and had attained finality. The review mechanism operates on changed circumstances and may support discontinuance of duty prospectively, but it does not confer power to backdate relief or nullify the original notification. Rule 14, which allows termination of proceedings in appropriate cases, was not available to justify retrospective withdrawal in a review proceeding. The withdrawal recommendation therefore operated only prospectively, and retrospective relief was rejected. en-us Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Aug 2017 16:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332862 A mid-term review under the Anti-Dumping Rules cannot be used to retrospectively withdraw anti-dumping duty and unsettle an earlier final finding that was never challenged and had attained finality. The review mechanism operates on changed circumstances and may support discontinuance of duty prospectively, but it does not confer power to backdate relief or nullify the original notification. Rule 14, which allows termination of proceedings in appropriate cases, was not available to justify retrospective withdrawal in a review proceeding. The withdrawal recommendation therefore operated only prospectively, and retrospective relief was rejected. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332862