<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1114 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332853</link>
    <description>Input tax credit cannot be reversed merely because a seller&#039;s registration was cancelled retrospectively where the purchaser relied on a valid registration certificate at the time of supply; retrospective cancellation does not, by itself, defeat credit already availed on a then-subsisting registration. The Court also held that the challenge to the retrospective cancellation order required fresh consideration because the affected authority had not been given an adequate opportunity to respond. Accordingly, the credit-reversal appeals failed, while the cancellation challenge was remanded for reconsideration on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1114 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332853</link>
      <description>Input tax credit cannot be reversed merely because a seller&#039;s registration was cancelled retrospectively where the purchaser relied on a valid registration certificate at the time of supply; retrospective cancellation does not, by itself, defeat credit already availed on a then-subsisting registration. The Court also held that the challenge to the retrospective cancellation order required fresh consideration because the affected authority had not been given an adequate opportunity to respond. Accordingly, the credit-reversal appeals failed, while the cancellation challenge was remanded for reconsideration on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>