<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1321 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for refund of Merchant Over Time (MOT) charges, which were initially denied due to a sub judice matter before the High Court. The Tribunal considered that the High Court had already dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, making the appellant eligible for the refund. The decision underscores the significance of respecting higher court judgments and the finality they bring to legal disputes, ensuring fairness and adherence to the legal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:51:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1321 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for refund of Merchant Over Time (MOT) charges, which were initially denied due to a sub judice matter before the High Court. The Tribunal considered that the High Court had already dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, making the appellant eligible for the refund. The decision underscores the significance of respecting higher court judgments and the finality they bring to legal disputes, ensuring fairness and adherence to the legal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>