<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1215 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming service tax liability, interest, and penalties on the appellant for receiving free cement and steel during contract execution. Relying on a precedent, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand for service tax on the value of the free supplies was unsustainable. The appeal was allowed, granting any necessary consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:51:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=443004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1215 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming service tax liability, interest, and penalties on the appellant for receiving free cement and steel during contract execution. Relying on a precedent, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand for service tax on the value of the free supplies was unsustainable. The appeal was allowed, granting any necessary consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>