https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186700 Consensual procedural directions were issued for fresh drawal of seized samples in the presence of both sides and for their dispatch to the identified laboratory for analysis. The Tribunal treated the accreditation requirement as relating to product testing as per the applicable standards, rather than to each individual testing parameter, and proceeded on that basis. Testing was to be completed within a fixed time, with the cost of analysis borne by the applicant. No substantive customs liability was adjudicated; the proceeding was disposed of through agreed sampling and laboratory testing directions. en-us Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Sep 2016 22:39:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186700 Consensual procedural directions were issued for fresh drawal of seized samples in the presence of both sides and for their dispatch to the identified laboratory for analysis. The Tribunal treated the accreditation requirement as relating to product testing as per the applicable standards, rather than to each individual testing parameter, and proceeded on that basis. Testing was to be completed within a fixed time, with the cost of analysis borne by the applicant. No substantive customs liability was adjudicated; the proceeding was disposed of through agreed sampling and laboratory testing directions. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186700