<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (10) TMI 36 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186688</link>
    <description>Litigation expenses incurred to defend or assert an existing title to business assets are revenue in nature and deductible if laid out wholly and exclusively for the business. By contrast, expenditure incurred to obtain specific performance of an executory agreement and thereby acquire a new capital asset is capital in nature and not deductible as revenue expenditure. Where a suit contains severable claims, the portion of court-fee attributable to the title claim may be allowed, while the part referable to acquisition of capital rights must be excluded. On the stated facts, the expenses relating to maintenance of title were deductible, but the expenditure linked to acquisition of a capital asset was not.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:22:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (10) TMI 36 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186688</link>
      <description>Litigation expenses incurred to defend or assert an existing title to business assets are revenue in nature and deductible if laid out wholly and exclusively for the business. By contrast, expenditure incurred to obtain specific performance of an executory agreement and thereby acquire a new capital asset is capital in nature and not deductible as revenue expenditure. Where a suit contains severable claims, the portion of court-fee attributable to the title claim may be allowed, while the part referable to acquisition of capital rights must be excluded. On the stated facts, the expenses relating to maintenance of title were deductible, but the expenditure linked to acquisition of a capital asset was not.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>