https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332847 The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioner should pursue the appellate remedy before the CESTAT to address the disputed questions of fact and the validity of the impugned order. No costs were imposed, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332847 The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioner should pursue the appellate remedy before the CESTAT to address the disputed questions of fact and the validity of the impugned order. No costs were imposed, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=332847