<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 1159 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186680</link>
    <description>Newspaper printing ink falls within Entry 45 of the First Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act because the entry, read in its statutory context, reflects an intent to include printing ink within the taxed goods. The absence of a comma between &quot;lithographic&quot; and &quot;printing&quot; does not narrow the entry, as punctuation is only a subsidiary aid and cannot defeat clear legislative meaning. An interpretation excluding printing ink was rejected because it would render the word &quot;printing&quot; redundant, contrary to the rule that every word in a statute should be given effect where possible. Commercial understanding and the nature of lithography as a printing process also supported inclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:57:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=442959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 1159 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186680</link>
      <description>Newspaper printing ink falls within Entry 45 of the First Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act because the entry, read in its statutory context, reflects an intent to include printing ink within the taxed goods. The absence of a comma between &quot;lithographic&quot; and &quot;printing&quot; does not narrow the entry, as punctuation is only a subsidiary aid and cannot defeat clear legislative meaning. An interpretation excluding printing ink was rejected because it would render the word &quot;printing&quot; redundant, contrary to the rule that every word in a statute should be given effect where possible. Commercial understanding and the nature of lithography as a printing process also supported inclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>